Volume 352 — United States Reports

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 352 of the United States Reports:

Held: she had acquired against her late husband upon her payment of the guaranty, went on to say, 190 F.2d at pages 103, 104: 24 'She (the widow) argues that the court's theory of a debt against her husband's estate amounts to a subrogation forced upon her, contrary to the equitable spirit of the doctrine, to yield her an utterly worthless claim and a very real tax liability. * * * (W)e think her argument persuasive. * *…

Held: as we must, that relief from the hardship imposed by a state statute is the responsibility of the state legislature and not of the courts, unless some constitutional guarantee is infringed. In this connection, we note that the New York Legislature this year has ameliorated to some extent the severity of Title D, Chapter 17.

from pages 158-159 intentionally omitted] Mr. Ralph S. Spritzer, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Mr. Robert W. Ginnane, Washington, D.C., for appellee Interstate Commerce Commission. Mr. Windsor F. Cousins, Philadelphia, Pa., for railroad appellees. Mr.

Butler v. Michigan, 352 U.S. 380 (1957), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the court held that laws criminalizing the sale of non-obscene literature to adults based on its perceived unsuitability for children were unconstitutional on the grounds of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Felix Frankfurter's majority opinion in the case has often been cited for its use of the "burn the house to roast the pig" quip. Though overshadowed by other landmark free speech decisions from the Warren Court, Butler v. Michigan has been described by contemporary scholars as a "key free speech victory" and the decision is considered to mark the end of harm to youth as a rationale for official censorship and regulation of printed matter.

Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 (1957), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that involuntary blood samples, taken by a skilled technician to determine intoxication, do not violate substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. This case was only the second time the Court considered whether police could forcibly enter inside a suspect's body to extract evidence. Writing for a 6–3 majority, Justice Tom C. Clark argued that blood tests were necessary as a matter of public policy to ensure traffic safety on roads and highways, and that "modern community living requires modern scientific methods of crime detection." Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice William O.

Radovich v. National Football League (NFL), 352 U.S. 445 (1957), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that professional football, unlike professional baseball, was subject to antitrust laws. It was the third of three such cases heard by the Court in the 1950s involving the antitrust status of professional sports.

from pages 457-458 intentionally omitted] Mr. Bruce Bromley, New York, City, for appellant. Mr. Samuel I Rosenman, New York City, for appellee National Gypsum Company. Mr.Norman A. Miller, Chicago, Ill., for appellee Certain-Teed Products Corporation. Mr. Justice HARLAN delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 United States Gypsum Company appeals from a decree of a three-judge court of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, entered December 9, 1954.