Volume 373 — United States Reports

Held: and no proof in support of the claim had been offered at the hearing. Wong Doo v. United States, 265 U. S. 239 .

White v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 59 (1963), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the arraignment is a critical stage in the criminal trial that attaches the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty (exculpatory evidence).

from pages 113-115 intentionally omitted] Milton Kramer, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., for respondents.

Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul, 373 U.S. 132 (1963), was a 1963 decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Court declined to invalidate a California law that imposed minimum fat content standards on avocados sold in the state, including those imported from other states. The law prohibited the sale of avocados that did not contain at least 8% oil by weight. Florida, a major avocado producer, employed, for wholesale marketing purposes, a federal standard unrelated to oil content. Most Florida avocados that were marketable at home failed to meet the California standard, because they were a different variety from those sold in California, with a lower fat content.

Held: in which the prosecuting attorney explained that his purpose was to show that Mrs. Kahn was not in danger of a conspiracy charge. The court sustained Mr. Fitzgerald’s objection to the materiality of the questions. The interrogation was then discontinued. *183 After another recess, the Government resumed the presentation of its case by calling its other witnesses.

Held: were entitled to reinstatement as of the date of their unconditional abandonment of the strike regardless of replacements.

Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U.S. 244, was a United States Supreme Court case that maintained the illegality of race-based segregation in public places. Ten African American student protesters were arrested and convicted in Greenville, South Carolina for attempting to purchase food at an S.H. Kress lunch counter. After the African American students arrived at the restaurant and sat at the lunch counter, the manager abruptly closed the store and instructed the protesters to leave. The manager and police argued that the protesters violated a state trespassing ordinance and were not arrested because of their race.

Silver v. New York Stock Exchange, 373 U.S. 341 (1963), was a case of the United States Supreme Court which was decided May 20, 1963. It held that the duty of self-regulation imposed upon the New York Stock Exchange by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 did not exempt it from the antitrust laws nor justify its in denying petitioners the direct-wire connections without the notice and hearing which they requested. Therefore, the Exchange's action in this case violated 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the NYSE is liable to petitioners under 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act.

from pages 379-380 intentionally omitted] Carlisle M. Moore, Mellin, Hanscom & Hursh, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. F. Trowbridge vom Baur, Washington, D.C., for respondent. [Amicus Curiae from pages 380-381 intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Petitioner is a practitioner registered to practice before the United States Patent Office. He has not been admitted to practice law before the Florida or any other bar.

Held: and Pan-Atlantic would have us hold, that petitioner must be completely denied the traditional and basic protection of the warranty of seaworthiness simply because Pan-Atlantic was not only the owner pro hac vice of the ship but was also petitioner's employer.

Held: in a case very close on its facts to that at bar, that an actual trespass need not be shown in order to support a violation of the Fourth Amendment. Silverman v. United States, supra, at 511.

Held: the first hearing did not conform to our mandate in Campbell I because Staula was not called to testify; and the hearing was unsatisfactory in other respects. Moreover, while Toomey's testimony at the second hearing did not contradict his earlier testimony, it was considerably more detailed.

from pages 526-527 intentionally omitted] Constance B. Motley, New York City, for petitioners. Thomas R. Prewitt, Memphis, Tenn., for respondents.

from pages 546-549 intentionally omitted] Mark Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., for complainant. Northcutt Ely, Washington, D.C., for defendant State of California. R. P. Parry, Twin Falls, Idaho, for intervener State of Nevada. Sol. Gen. Archibald Cox for intervener United States.

Held: however, that “in the sense of Bell v. Hood, 327 U. S. 678 ,” there was “jurisdiction to entertain the claim for money damages,” and to that extent reversed. 280 F. 2d 293 . On remand the District Court dismissed the action without opinion. The Court of Appeals affirmed. 302 F. 2d 36 . The case is here on a petition for a writ of certiorari which we granted. 371 U. S. 812 .

Held: 'The complaint of the relator is that his children have been excluded, on account of their color, from the school">public school of said city located near his residence, and been required to attend a school located a mile and a half distant from his residence, established exclusively for colored children.

NLRB v. General Motors Corp., 373 U.S. 734 (1963) is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the definition of "membership" in labor unions under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The court upheld that the requirement of employees paying union fees as a condition of employment does not violate federal labor law, whether they formally join the union or not. The ruling helped unions gain a better ability to collect financial support from all employees they represent.

from 746 intentionally omitted] S. G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Bernard B. Weksler, Miami, Fla., for respondents. Mr. Justice WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Like National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp., 373 U.S. 734 , 83 S.Ct. 1453, decided today, this case involves the status of an 'agency shop' arrangement.